wordpress-seo
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home3/retailp1/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114mfn-opts
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home3/retailp1/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114<\/p>\r\n
Retailers must create radical value, not just for consumers, but for brands.<\/strong><\/p>\r\n This article was originally published on Business of Fashion.<\/em><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\r\n Bad retailers will never run out of customers. History suggests that there is always a segment of the consumer population willing to trade down if they believe they can save a dollar or two. Some retailers, like long-beleaguered J.C. Penney, have spent decades proving this thesis.<\/p>\r\n No, bad retailers will never run out of customers. But they will run out of brands. And the reason for that comes down to simple math.<\/p>\r\n At its core, retail has always been a value exchange between brands, consumers and retailers, with retailers occupying the precarious middle part of the equation. For the relationship to hold, each party must contribute value to the others, leaving each stakeholder feeling richer. But in a post-industrial and increasingly post-digital and post-pandemic world, the retailer\u2019s place in that equation has become more complicated.<\/p>\r\n Only a decade or two ago, delivering value as a retailer was relatively simple. Brands brought product design, quality and name recognition to the equation. Consumers brought demand and dollars. And retailers, in most cases, needed only to provide physical points of distribution for products coupled with a willingness to relay product information on behalf of the brand to consumers. Everyone was satisfied \u2014 until now, that is.<\/p>\r\n The problem today is that while the value contributed by brands and consumers has remained more or less constant, the contribution traditionally made by retailers is now all but worthless. Consumers, with the internet at their fingertips, no longer require retailers to act as porters of product information. Likewise, brands with unmitigated digital access to hundreds of millions of consumers no longer need to rely on a third-party retailer\u2019s physical assets for customer acquisition or product distribution. In other words, consumers and brands have all the tools they need to carry on quite capably without retailers. Hence,\u00a0brands like Nike are ramping up their direct-to-consumer strategies<\/a>\u00a0and dispensing, to a large extent, with wholesale.<\/p>\r\n It has all driven us to a rather dramatic moment in retail history. A point where retailers across all categories, including fashion, have to completely rethink the value they bring to their part of the equation. They must once and for all retire easy scapegoats like Amazon, e-commerce and Millennials because the real enemy is none of these external forces, but rather their own failures to beat back irrelevance, a condition for which there is only one cure. They must reinvent themselves and contribute new radical value, not only for consumers but for brands, too.<\/p>\r\n This notion of radical value is important. For example, love them or not, brands are drawn by the tens of thousands to sell on Amazon because Amazon radically redefined our sense of selection and convenience. And, in the process they formed a global tribe of Prime Members almost 200 million deep. Similarly, Alibaba has executed a radical level of integration into the lives of its customers, offering brands access to the world\u2019s largest single market of shoppers.<\/p>\r\n In order to survive, all retailers must create similarly radical levels of value.<\/p>\r\n It starts with creating radical value for customers. Retailers can and must create radical value in one or more of four areas: culture, entertainment, expertise or product.<\/p>\r\n Outdoor retailer Patagonia creates radical cultural value through its single-minded focus on environmental stewardship, placing this imperative at the core of everything the business does, right up to baking it into its financial model, making Patagonia as much a social movement as a mere retailer: a lightning rod for likeminded customers and staff. All organisational objectives, communications and initiatives ladder back up to environmental protection, making Patagonia a tribal outpost for customers who share its values.<\/p>\r\n Retailers can also create customer value with entertainment. UK department store Selfridges creates radical entertainment value through an intense focus on experience. From streetwear departments with skate bowls to creative pop-ups and unique food and beverage installations,\u00a0the experience at Selfridges<\/a>\u00a0has, to a great extent, become the product itself. The years leading up to the pandemic saw the retailer make huge investments in what managing director\u00a0Andrew Keith recently called<\/a>\u00a0\u201call the magic that goes on in the store.\u201d<\/p>\r\nRadical Cultural Value<\/h2>\r\n
Radical Entertainment Value<\/h2>\r\n
Radical Expertise Value<\/h2>\r\n